SPECIAL REPORT
Tanzania is now seated
on heating bomb that may explode any time following increased series of land
conflicts currently escalating everywhere across the country, if deliberate and
concerted measures will not be taken to deal with the worsening situation,
Mirror digest can reveal.
The land conflicts normally
involving small scale producers such as farmers, pastoralists and big investors are also threatening long time
cherish peace and harmony in many places, leave alone food insecurity which is
sneaking along, in many parts marred by the conflicts.
An investigation
conducted by Mirror digest in large part of the country revealed that many conflicts
are fuelled by increasing agribusiness investments in which big local and
foreign investors have taken huge chunks of land without following proper land
acquisition process and procedures while small scale producers and livestock
keepers are left landless.
A good example is the
escalation of another big land clashes between the villagers of Galangala
village, Basutu ward, Hanang district in Manyara region and illegal invaders of
the former Basutu plantations in the ward.Last week, more than
700 irate villagers stormed into the former Basutu plantations and started distributing
the land among themselves with the aim of forcing out what they called “invaders”
of their land in the ward.
Interviewed in
different occasions, the villagers said, their move follows illegal acquisition
of their land by a huge number of business tycoons and government officials
from in and outside the district, something which denies the local residents
their right to own land.
However, they have
vowed to leave no stone unturned against any foreigner investor who would
resist from getting out of the land.Speaking to this
reporter, one of the villagers Martha Laurent said that the illegal occupiers
of their land come from Karatu, Singida, Dongobeshi, and other places.
However, when contacted
for comments, the village Chairman, Ibrahim Orii distanced himself from the
shoddy land deals, blaming the business tycoons instead for not following
proper process and procedures of land acquisition.
In Kisarawe
district, coastal region, more
than 10,000 outraged villagers from eleven villageshave vowed to stage
demonstrations against the government for failure to pay compensations
amounting to Sh 549 million for village land acquired through a controversial land
deal with a foreign biofuels firm more than four years ago.
Speaking to this reporter, the villagers said the investor,
Sunbiofuel Company (SBF), acquired some 8,211ha of land from the villages after
spirited campaigns backed by the district’s council leaders, to grow Jatropha,
but the villagers have never been full compensated and the company has already
sold its shares to another company called thirty degrees East (TDE) .
So far, the villagers have formed task force to make sure that
they press their demands to higher authorities. The task-force chairperson,
Ibrahim Muhadi from Malumbo village, Kibuta ward, told Mirror digest that under
the conditions for the land acquisition agreed upon between the villagers and
SBF, the investor was required to compensate individual and village lands all
valued at Sh 840 million which has not been fully paid to date.
However, the investor had never fulfilled his promise made
during land acquisition process. Some of the promises made were to build
schools, dispensaries, roads infrastructures, creation of 5,000 employment
opportunities and water supply services, but nothing has been made to date.Therefore
the villagers demand to be paid immediately, or else they would seek audience
with the Prime Minister Mizengo Pinda.
In
Lutukira, village, Mkongotema ward, Songea rural district, more than 1,790
residents are up in arms against the investor,
for acquiring 50,000 hectares of fertile land in their village without
following proper procedures.
They also accuse Songea district council for facilitating a shoddy
land deal and protecting Lutukira Mixed Farm Ltd for their own interests and
want the government to immediately to rescue the situation.
In an interview, one of the villagers Eligius Danda alleged
that the land process and procedures were not follows and now the villagers
want back their land. However, they blame the district council lawyer for
facilitating controversial terms in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) which,
to a large part, favours the investor.
Danda who is also a senior lecturer of the Moshi University
College of Co-operatives and Business Studies (MUCCoBS), said that due to
shortage of land, the villagers had initially agreed to give the investor some 25,000
hectares as a trial, but the investor reportedly backed by the district authorities
pressed for allocation of 50,000 hectares.
While some investors like Lutukira Mixed Farm of Songea and
the district council officials have dismissed allegations saying they are
baseless, others have admitted to have not paid the villagers.
However,
land activists, lawyers and scholars have blamed the government for lack of
transparency and full participation of the villagers in all stages of land
acquisition process and procedures.
In an interview with Elias Mtinda, the agriculture and food security advisor for Action Aid Tanzania, he said that the land conflicts are fuelled mainly by few people who either use their positions to acquire huge chunks of land or facilitates shoddy deals with foreign investors with the aim of benefiting themselves.
In an interview with Elias Mtinda, the agriculture and food security advisor for Action Aid Tanzania, he said that the land conflicts are fuelled mainly by few people who either use their positions to acquire huge chunks of land or facilitates shoddy deals with foreign investors with the aim of benefiting themselves.
“These
people acquire big chunks of land against the law and sometimes they don’t
develop, so due to increased population, land is becoming scarce in many
villages, that’s why locals tend to demand back their land hence clashes ” he
said.
Mtinda
recommended that the government should implement the land laws properly and the
investors should adhere to the land laws of the country. He also said the
government should conduct land surveys and land use plan to enable villagers
get title deeds and own land.
For his part,
programme officer for Land Rights Research and Resources Institute alias Haki ardhi,
Godfrey Massay said that there are myriad of reasons on the increasing trend of
land conflicts; some are caused by expansion of towns, and poor land compensations
of the land holders, increasing investments and land speculations in village
lands.
Godfrey who is a
lawyer named other reasons as weak land conflict adjudication bodies at village
and ward levels and costly and cumbersome judicial system. Also in the list are
stereotype towards pastoralism lack of knowledge of land rights among citizens,
political interference in land acquisitions, weak land administration bodies at
local levels, corruption and unscrupulous elites.
Godfrey who has
done several researches on land conflicts issues in the country said that there
is need for legal reforms and changes of practices and habits. Constitutional
protection of land rights, land rights awareness programmes, support and
strengthening of land administrative and arbitral bodies recognition and
allocation of indigenous pastoralist and grazing areas and comprehensive
village land use plan in all villages.
He also
recommended that there is a need for democratic and accountable government and
respect of human rights.
For his part,
Land issues expert Valentine Olyang’iri Ngorisaalso working for Haki ardhi, had
different views. According to him, the problem of increased land conflicts is
not because of land laws but lack of implementation of the laws. He said that
land laws are very good but the government officials who are tasked to
implement them are not honest and in many cases they are corrupt as they collude
with investors to facilitate shoddy land deals.
Valentine who is
also environmentalist said that the whole system of investment in the country
should be overhauled because the increasing land conflicts are fuelled by a
tendency of the investors to go direct to the village level and lure the
villagers instead of adhering to proper procedures of land acquisition.
However, he said
that the current wave of land conflicts is a sign that the villagers are now
aware of their rights, so, the government should give them more education on
their rights so that they can make informed choices when dealing with foreign
investors.
Former programme
Officer for Lawyers Environmental Action Team (LEAT) Stanslaus Nyembeawho is a
lawyer said that most of these problems of land conflicts emanates from awkward
land laws and policies which do not favorite the locals.
Citing an
example of 99 years land tenure an investor is given while the population of
Tanzania is on the increase, he said that it is nonsense an investor a huge
land under controversial terms while many youth are jobless and the locals have
no adequate land which is number one capital for many villagers.
He said experience
shows that the investors are not sustainable and the nature of their
investments have very devastating effects on local production especially soil
fertility adding that sometimes the villagers end up paying up costs of land
degradation and loss of access to local resources.
“Most investors
have the culture of dispossession and harvesting without investing. So to say,
there is a danger of creating vagabonds and criminals in big cities due to the
influx of people whose farms have been grabbed by investors to big towns and
cities like Dar es Salaam” he said.
A lecturer of
University of Dar es Salaam, political science and public Administration Dr.
Godfrey Sansa said that the whole idea of foreign investment is exploitative in
nature that’s why there are many land conflicts.
“If you look at
the nature of foreign investments, which, in recent days have been fuelling
land conflicts, you will learn that it is because most contracts entered
between the investors and the villagers are not transparent. You find that when
entering contracts the investors are presented with very competent lawyers and
advocates but the villagers are presented with village leaders and even if they
are represented by the district council lawyers, normally these lawyers are not
competent enough” he said.
He suggests that
there is a need to empower the villagers in terms of land laws, policies and
the contracts. However, the legal framework governing land should be overhauled
and the leaders should put forward commitment and patriotism.
Ends.
Ends.
By MwigaMtavya
Post a Comment